.svg)
The legal sector is experiencing a digital transformation. Legal chatbots — i.e. AI-based legal advice tools — are rapidly gaining in importance against the backdrop of increasing demand for digital legal services. They promise faster, cheaper and 24/7 advice. Studies already show that Legal Tech And AI in particular are regarded as a key innovation factor in the legal market
This article explains how legal chatbots work, their uses, opportunities and risks. It becomes clear that when used correctly, legal chatbots can facilitate access to law and offer real added value to both law firms and clients.
What are legal chatbots?
Legal chatbots Are programs that simulate a conversation with a user and provide legal information or support.
Put simply, it is Text-based dialog systems, which answer legal questions automatically — in writing or even orally. Technically, they are based on artificial intelligence (AI), in particular Natural language processing for speech processing and Machine learning for continuous improvement. Unlike simple FAQ chatbots, legal chatbots draw on extensive legal knowledge databases and understand technical terms, laws and judgments
As a result, they can handle more complex queries than traditional chatbots, which often only provide predefined answers.
A legal chatbot “learns” from many examples and patterns. Modern systems such as GPT-4 are able to formulate extremely naturally. Die How it works It is similar to that of a virtual legal assistant: The user asks a question in everyday language, the chatbot analyses the input, searches through its knowledge base and generates a suitable answer or even a document. It is important that legal chatbots Do not replace lawyers, but automate routine tasks. The human lawyer remains indispensable for complex strategic decisions — AI serves as a supporting tool
In contrast to traditional methods of legal advice, however, legal chatbots enable Interact in real time And lower the hurdles of obtaining initial legal information “at the push of a button”
Areas of application of legal chatbots
Legal chatbots can be used profitably in many areas of law. From Contract Review to Compliance Checks to Customer Service — they automate time-consuming routine work.
Here is an overview of four key areas of application:
Contract review and preparation
Legal chatbots offer great added value in Contracts. In this way, AI assistants can analyze extensive contracts, identify risky clauses and suggest improvements within seconds. Established legal tech providers such as LawgeeX Use machine learning to automatically check contracts and point out deviations from standard company standards
Standard contracts such as NDAs or employment contracts can be executed by a chatbot in a dialogue-based manner by the user simply entering the relevant information and the chatbot generating a draft contract from this. This saves lawyers an enormous amount of time on routine contracts and minimizes errors in the text. In practice, this means: Where a lawyer used to spend hours drawing up or checking a document, today a well-trained lawyer delivers Legal chatbot A result in minutes — all the lawyer has to do is finally check it.
Compliance and due diligence
With Compliance checks And the Due diligence — as part of company takeovers, for example — huge amounts of documents need to be reviewed. This is where legal chatbots show their strengths in terms of speed and accuracy. AI systems such as Kira or Harvey AI Search Contracts and Documents for Specific Clauses or Risks and Prepare the Results Clearly
In an M&A project, for example, hundreds of contracts can be checked for compliance with certain legal requirements without having to manually read each contract by lawyers. Harvey, a chatbot based on GPT, is already being used by major law firms to significantly speed up routine checks and searches (e.g. for specific contract clauses or regulatory requirements)
Also in the area risk management Chatbots can be used: They search internal guidelines, legal texts and judgments to provide quick information as to whether a specific procedure complies with applicable regulations. In doing so, they support Compliance Departments While identifying errors or violations at an early stage. Overall, the scalability of AI checks makes it possible to analyze significantly more documents in a short period of time than by humans alone — a decisive advantage when deadlines are tight in due diligence projects.
Legal customer service
Legal chatbots offer great potential in legal customer service. Law firms, legal advice portals and legal protection insurers are increasingly using chatbots to answer initial legal questions from (potential) clients. A typical example is the Mandate acceptance: Instead of a complicated web form, a prospective customer can simply describe their concerns to the chatbot. He then asks specific questions and collects all relevant information. The law firm Bagusche + Partner For example, on their website, uses a AI chatbot called “Jupus”Who requests the client's required information upon initial contact. Based on this data, the law firm efficiently decides whether to accept the mandate. Experience shows that Jupus was well received by clients within a short period of time and significantly streamlined the internal process.
But chatbots can also be used during an ongoing mandate: They answer frequently asked questions (“What is the status of my case? ”, “What documents are required? “) immediately and at any time. Legal service providers also use chatbots as virtual assistantsto provide simple legal information — e.g. to explain the requirements for termination or the deadline for an appeal. This improves accessibility and service quality for clients enormously, because not every concern has to wait for a call back from a lawyer. Even government agencies are experimenting with chatbots to make legal information available to citizens (such as chatbots for consumer protection issues or tenant rights). However, a clear distinction is important: complex individual advice still belongs to lawyers, while the chatbot provides standardized information.
Employment Law and Human Resources
Even in Labor Law And legal chatbots are finding their way into HR. HR departments of large companies must constantly clarify legal issues relating to employee matters — from maternity leave to working hours and notice periods, often taking federal and state law into account. Specialized chatbots such as VirgiLhr chatbot Act here as Real-Time Compliance Assistants: They have been trained by labor law experts and advise HR managers on current employment law requirements, such as questions about vacation, employee classification or prohibitions of discrimination.
Using a chat interface, HR managers can ask questions such as “How long is parental leave in Federal State X? ” or “What steps must be taken in the event of an operational termination? ”. The Chatbot then analyses thousands of relevant regulations at federal, state and local levels and provides a specific, legally secure recommendation for action.
This ensures that the HR department is always on The latest legal status acts. In addition, such chatbots can create or check common HR documents — such as employment contracts or warnings — and automatically check whether the current legal requirements (minimum wage, data protection clauses, etc.) are being met.
The introduction of a legal chatbot in the HR sector significantly reduces the risk of non-compliance and relieves the legal department of routine issues. Employees get answers to questions about their rights more quickly, and the company can make work processes legally secure. Especially with Decentralized Teams and in Times of Working from Home, a 24/7 digital HR lawyer A valuable assistant to guarantee consistent and up-to-date information.
The Benefits of Legal Chatbots
The use of AI chatbots in the legal sector offers a range of Benefits, which are both economic and qualitative in nature. Implemented correctly, legal chatbots can increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve the service experience.
Here is an overview of the most important advantages:
Time and cost savings
One of the biggest advantages of legal chatbots is the enormous Saving time for repetitive tasks. What used to take hours or days — such as digging through a contract archive — is done in seconds by an AI system. For Law Firms and Legal Departments, This Also Means Tangible Cost savingsAs employee capacities can be better used. An example: The international Law firm Allen & Overy reportsThat the use of an AI assistance system called Harvey saves their lawyers several hours of routine work per week.
Extrapolated savings of this kind can reduce annual personnel costs by considerable amounts. At the same time, more mandates can be processed or additional services can be offered in the time gained. The efficiency gain also pays off for clients: When standard processes are automated, legal services can be offered faster and often at a lower price. In addition, internal time pressure is reduced — urgent information or documents are delivered immediately without having to work night shifts. Companies that have to review hundreds of contracts, for example, no longer need to employ a large team of lawyers for days, but first let the chatbot pre-sort and filter out obvious problems. The lawyers then get involved specifically where it is really necessary. Overall, legal chatbots allow a better scalability legal work: One and the same system can process countless inquiries in parallel without the need for additional resources.
scalability
Legal chatbots provide legal services scalable. Where a human lawyer can only serve a limited number of clients at the same time, there is virtually no limit for a chatbot. It can serve ten, a hundred or a thousand users at the same time — the response times remain equally fast. This Mass Business Can be achieved through automation without reducing quality. For companies, this means that peak times with high volumes of inquiries (e.g. when a new regulation triggers questions for many customers) can be cushioned without having to provide additional staff. scalability This is also reflected in the fact that once trained, AI models can be used as often as you like.
One example is an insurance chatbot that answers thousands of simple legal questions about contract clauses every day, which would hardly be possible to represent in terms of personnel with human advisors. The investment in developing a chatbot quickly pays off when you consider that it can be used around the clock for years. Scalability opens up new business models for law firms: They could have low-threshold Online consulting services Offer that reach a large audience without having to employ dozens of lawyers. The technology therefore also helps automated legal advice to make it available to a wider audience. However, it is important that AI is expanded accordingly on the server side as volumes increase — but cloud infrastructures today allow flexible resource adjustment. In summary: Legal chatbots grow with requirements without sacrificing quality or speed. This scales legal advice to a new level.
24/7 availability
A human legal advisor needs sleep, vacation and may even call it a day — a Legal chatbot On the other hand 24 hours a day, 7 days a week available. This continuous commitment is an invaluable advantage in a globalized and digital world. Clients can get answers to urgent questions at any time of the day or night, even on weekends or public holidays. This increases the Customer satisfaction significant, because legal problems do not last for business hours. In addition, chatbots do not experience exhaustion: they neither get tired nor impatient. A chatbot is “never in a bad mood” and still patiently delivers answers even at three o'clock in the morning
This reliability is particularly valuable when dealing with stressed clients who may need immediate information in an acute situation (e.g. after an accident or in the event of a deadline). 24/7 availability also makes geographical borders irrelevant — clients in different time zones can use the service without having to rely on office hours in their home country.
This is also useful internally: Employees in companies can ask compliance questions to the chatbot outside regular hours and receive an immediate assessment. Last but not least, chatbots can be programmed to work in the client support Be proactive — e.g. automatically send reminders of deadlines or regularly ask about the progress of something — all without human intervention, at any time. Constant availability goes hand in hand with consistent quality: The chatbot's performance is not slowing down. This combination of always available and always consistent makes legal chatbots ideal helpers in modern legal advice.
Reduction of errors
People make mistakes — especially when doing monotonous routine tasks or under time pressure, carelessness easily creeps in. Legal chatbots can be used here for higher accuracy Worry They work strictly rule-based or data-based and are not influenced by factors such as stress, fatigue or subjective bias. As a result Avoid human errors such as subjectivity or overlooking essential information from the outset
An example: When reviewing a contract, an inexperienced lawyer may forget to pay attention to a specific clause — the trained chatbot, on the other hand, reliably checks every contract for all risk factors known to him. The AI will consistently process the same inputs in the same way. Calculation errors (such as claims amounts or interest calculations in contracts) can also be ruled out, as the chatbot makes precise calculations. The important thing is: The chatbot Learns from corrections — As soon as an error is identified and fixed, it will no longer occur in the future, while people may be able to repeat the same mistake under certain circumstances.
The machine also closes BiasOff: While a person may unconsciously incorporate prejudices or experiences, the chatbot objectively follows its algorithm. Of course, accuracy depends on correct training and the quality of the database. But with careful development, a very high level of accuracy can be achieved. Some providers are already advertising that their AI is more precise than the average person when it comes to certain tasks. Good legal chatbot systems also monitor themselves: They log all inquiries and answers so that developers and lawyers can review and improve the results. Overall, legal chatbots lead to a higher consistency and reliability In legal advice — which gives clients confidence and reduces the risk of liability due to mistakes.
Limits and challenges
Despite all the advantages, it should be noted that legal chatbots are not a miracle cure. Your use also throws legal, ethical and practical challenges On. Companies and law firms must know and manage these limits in order not to take risks. The four most important problem areas are:
Data Protection & Compliance
When sensitive legal information is processed digitally, the Data Protection An outstanding role. Legal chatbots often work in the cloud or access external AI APIs — but may personal data In no way flow uncontrollably from clients.
Particularly in countries such as Germany with strict data protection laws (keyword GDPR) and professional obligations (attorneys' privilege), the highest security standards must apply. Sensitive client information May only be processed in secure environments. The motto is: “When dealing with bots and dialog systems, please always observe: Data protection of personal data, attorneys' privilege, copyright and other IP rights, trade and trade secrets must be strictly protected.”.
In concrete terms, this means that a chatbot, for example, may not feed unfiltered ChatGPT requests with real case files without the client's consent and without technical protective measures. Companies should check where the data is processed (keyword cloud location) and whether the provider Compliance Guaranteed by laws.
In addition, the chatbot itself must be legally compliant — for example, fulfill imprint requirements or make it clear that it is not legal advice within the meaning of the Legal Services Act, unless a lawyer is involved. In Germany, for example, automated legal advice is quickly moving into the grey area of the RDG (Legal Services Act). However, there have been openings here in recent years to enable innovative legal tech offerings as long as certain quality requirements are met. In spite of everything, a legal chatbot should always be under supervision. Responsible lawyers Must review the final results, particularly in sensitive matters. In this way, you can take advantage of the benefits without violating professional rules.
Liability issues
Who is liable if the legal chatbot is wrong? This question has not yet been finally clarified legally, but involves significant risks. The fact is: AI models can make mistakes. They may be prone to “hallucinations” — i.e. to generate convincing sounding but incorrect answers.
If a chatbot gives false legal advice and causes damage to the user as a result, the question of liability arises. In most cases, the operator of the chatbot (the law firm or company) will be responsible, because the chatbot is just a tool. A prominent case from Canada already shows where the journey could go: A Canadian Court (Civil Resolution Tribunal in British Columbia) declared the airline Air Canada liable for incorrect information provided by its AI chatbot.
The bot had given a customer false information about ticket refunds, whereupon the airline was ultimately sentenced to refund — on the grounds that the chatbot had a “negligent misrepresentation” Committed on behalf of the company.
This example illustrates: Companies have a responsibilityTo ensure that chatbot answers are correct. It is advisable to always make it clear in the chatbot interface that the information is automated and, if necessary, to display a disclaimer (“This does not constitute binding legal advice.”). But whether such a disclaimer is sufficient in an emergency remains to be seen. It is also important that Insurance situation: Professional liability insurance from lawyers may not (yet) cover AI damage. Another liability issue concerns compliance with deadlines: If, for example, you rely on a deadline chatbot and the date is wrong, a client could suffer a loss of rights.
Therefore, critical processes should always be provided with redundant backups. Companies would do well to have their chatbot deployments legally audited and internal Emergency processes If the chatbot fails or provides incorrect answers. The liability discussion will certainly continue to accompany the industry — until then, in case of doubt, a responsible person or the company behind the AI is still liable.
Lack of Empathy & Humanity
As efficient and clever as a chatbot may be, it remains a machine and lacks human qualities such as empathy, intuition, and moral judgment. Legal advice is a matter of trust. Many clients appreciate a personal conversation with a lawyer who listens, reassures and responds to the individual situation. Although a chatbot can process speech, it cannot show genuine compassion or capture the emotional state of a person seeking advice. Clients expect particularly in sensitive areas (e.g. family law, criminal law or personal misfortunes) humane Donation. This interpersonal level can Never replace digitization, how Lawyer Tobias Bagusche emphasizes.
His practical conclusion: Despite all digital communication, personal contact remains essential, as the client relationship is based on trust.
Chatbots should therefore be used primarily for standardized information transfer. As soon as a client needs individual support — for example because he is uncertain, emotionally burdened or the case is complex — a human lawyer should take over. Another aspect of the lack of empathy is Rigid Conversation Of a bot. For example, an experienced lawyer notices when the client has not understood something and can sensitively ask or rephrase it.
The chatbot follows its script and could frustrate the user if they get stuck or feel misunderstood. It is therefore advisable to design chatbots in such a way that they can be seamlessly handed over to employees (“Should I connect you with a lawyer? “) as soon as the Dialogue Stalls. User interfaces should also provide information on how the user can ask the question in order to get a helpful answer. Replacing empathy with technology is currently hardly possible. Legal chatbots should therefore always be seen as an addition to human dialogue, not as a substitute. The greatest strength lies in pre-selection and initial information — sensitive advice remains the domain of humans (for now).
Timeliness of data
A legal chatbot is only as good as the data it accesses. Laws and case law are constantly changing. A major challenge is therefore ensuring that the chatbot is up to date with the latest legal situation. A statically trained AI model (such as the basic version of ChatGPT with cut-off 2021) is not aware of recent laws or judgments and could therefore provide outdated information. This can lead to dangerous miscalculations, for example if a deadline has now been changed or a recent court ruling has postponed the legal situation. Developers and operators of legal chatbots must therefore establish mechanisms to To update the database regularly.
Ideally, the chatbot is connected to current legal databases or receives an update of its training material at defined intervals. Some modern chatbots go through a Internet connection in real time: Google's new AI service, for example, has Gemini (Bard) Access to the latest Google search and can therefore draw on the latest sources when talking.
As a result, it stays up to date, while a purely locally trained model does not have this option
A hybrid approach could be useful for legal chatbots: a combination of stable legal expertise and live updates on current developments. It is also important that Ongoing support from legal experts. For example, a team of lawyers should regularly check the chatbot and “feed” it with new legislative changes. The VirgilHR Chatbot mentioned above, for example, is continuously updated by a team of employment lawyers to always ensure the latest regulations
This maintenance requires resources but is essential to Quality of answers to secure. Another point: The chatbot must be able to Identify the need for change — For example, when he is increasingly unable to answer inquiries because the topic is new (such as a new Corona law). This is where analysis functions that report such gaps could start. Ultimately, users must be clearly informed of the status of the chatbot's knowledge (“status: 2024 legislation,” etc.). Die Data timeliness Is an ongoing task in the life cycle of a legal chatbot — but it can be solved if appropriate processes are planned from the start.
Practical examples: Successful legal chatbots
What do legal chatbots look like in practice? The following are a few practical examples And Voices from the Industry Who Show How the Theory Was Implemented in Successful Applications:
Known applications
A pioneer among legal chatbots is DoNotPay. This system, developed by then 18-year-old Joshua Browder, was originally created to combat speeding tickets — with resounding success. In the chat, DoNotPay asks the user a few questions about their parking violation and automatically generates an appeal, which is sent to the competent authority
Since its launch, DoNotPay has appealed nearly 200,000 speeding tickets in London and New York, saving those affected an estimated $4 million in fines
The BBC then named Browder as “Robin Hood of the Internet”, as it helped citizens defend themselves against fees in the meantime, DoNotPay has been expanded to include further modules (e.g. passenger compensation in the event of delays) and has become synonymous with how automated legal advice Can benefit a wide range of people.
Another well-known example is Harvey AI, a modern AI chatbot for large law firms. Harvey attracted attention when the Magic Circle law firm Allen & Overy announced at the beginning of 2023 that it would introduce the chatbot across the group for over 3,500 lawyers.
Harvey is based on GPT Technology and supports lawyers with contract analysis, due diligence and even the preparation of initial draft documents. The response is so positive that leading consulting firms such as PwC are also working with Harvey
In fact, according to the firm, tools such as Harvey are already saving lawyers several hours of working time per week. Harvey thus serves as a blueprint, such as Legal Tech And traditional large law firm culture can be successfully combined.
There are also numerous specialized chatbots in various areas of law: LawDroid From the USA enables smaller law firms to create their own chatbots without programming knowledge (no-code platform) and thus offer, for example, a 24/7 client service. In Switzerland, there are chatbots that help tenants check utility bills, and in Austria, they experimented with a “contract butler” that creates simple legal documents. The range of applications is constantly growing. What unites them all: They use AI to Access to Justice easier and faster — whether by helping citizens enforce their rights (such as DoNotPay) or relieving legal professionals of monotonous effort (such as Harvey).
Voices from the sector
The introduction of AI in the legal sector is provoking different reactions — from enthusiasm to skepticism. Some Voices from the sector Should illustrate the mood:
“Without adapting to today's digital options, it will certainly be difficult for many law firms to attract younger clients in particular — but these are the clients of tomorrow.” — Tobias Bagusche in an interview
This quote underlines how important digitization (including AI) is for the future viability of law firms. Young clients are used to calling up services digitally and are increasingly expecting the same from their lawyers.
“I think over time it will be a serious competitive disadvantage for law firms that do not adopt generative AI.” — David Wakeling, Partner at Allen & Overy
This statement — by analogy: “Law firms that do not use generative AI will have a serious competitive disadvantage in the long term.” — Shows that even in traditional top law firms, AI is seen as a game changer. There is a spirit of optimism and no one wants to miss out on the connection.
“AI chatbots... pose a significant risk [due to hallucinations].” — (Source: Frost Brown Todd)
On the other hand, experts warn of the risks of letting AI act unattended. The cases of false or even illegal information from bots observed in the USA have sparked the discussion about quality control and liability. These critical voices are important in order to avoid hype and incorporate pragmatic security measures.
In the jurisprudence A lot is also published about legal chatbots. For example, some authors emphasize that legal chatbots are primarily used as Access-to-justice tool Could serve — for example, to provide low-income population groups with simple legal information free of charge that would otherwise be denied to them. According to a US study, 92% of the legal needs of low-income earners remain unmet
Many see this as an opportunity to close this gap somewhat using chatbots (of course, this does not replace the necessary structural support for consulting assistance).
In summary, the industry's voices reflect: There are great expectations for legal chatbots, but also the recognition that they must be introduced with care. Innovation yes — but responsibly.
Future outlook
The triumph of legal chatbots is still in its infancy. Rapid developments are expected in the future, which will further revolutionize digital legal advice.
The underlying AI technology is becoming increasingly powerful. Current large language models (such as GPT-4) will be replaced in the foreseeable future by even stronger models that can understand and process more complex legal issues. In the future, we could Legal chatbots Are created, which not only answer individual questions, but entire Case analyses Carry out: You present a situation to the bot and it automatically identifies the legal problems, suggests solutions and points out possible risks.
Also the integration of multimodality That's an issue — future chatbots could, for example, directly read and interpret images or PDF documents (contracts, certificates). For example, a scanned notification could be uploaded and the bot would explain the appeal against it. Work is also being done to
Chatbots with Argumentative intelligence So that they can list legal arguments for and against, which is the case with the Case Strategy helps. An important driver here is research in the area Explainable AI: In the future, AI systems could better justify their answers, for example by referring specifically to paragraphs or judgments. This would enormously increase acceptance in the legal sector, as you can understand the “thought processes” of AI. Overall, the Quality of Chatbot Answers will continue to approach that of human experts — perhaps not in terms of creativity or empathy, but in terms of fact fidelity and stringency.
Experts also see the possibility that AI will at some point Translate languages simultaneously Can, so that a client asks a question in his native language, the chatbot translates it into legal German, researches it, and answers it again in simple language. This could remove language barriers in legal advice. It is also possible that chatbots could network with each other: A tax law chatbot could automatically consult another specialized bot in the event of a marginal employment law question. All these developments indicate that legal chatbots are becoming more and more intelligent assistants Advance, who supports lawyers and clients like a second (digital) colleague.
Conclusion
Legal chatbots Are undoubtedly one of the most exciting developments in the area Legal Tech. They have the potential to fundamentally change legal advice — towards more Efficiency, Accessibility and Customer orientation. In summary, the following key points can be identified:
- In practice, they have already proven themselves in contract reviews, compliance checks, customer service (e.g. client onboarding) and in internal company areas such as HR legal compliance.
- The benefits lie in enormous time and cost savings, consistent quality and immediate availability. Routine tasks are accelerated or eliminated altogether, which creates space for higher-quality legal activities.
- At the same time, the limits must be respected: data protection and confidentiality have top priority, the results of AI should always be validated by a human, and personal advice remains irreplaceable in many situations.
- In the future, legal chatbots will become even more powerful thanks to technical developments and could establish themselves as a natural tool in everyday legal life. Lawyers using these tools will have an advantage, while abandoning the technology could be a competitive disadvantage in the longer term.
So why is investing in legal chatbots worthwhile? Because when used correctly, they create a win-win situation: Clients have low-threshold access to real-time legal advice, and law firms/companies can work more efficiently and concentrate on the essentials. In addition, a law firm that uses AI signals a willingness to innovate and focus on the future, which is particularly attractive for the next generation of clients.
